Donald Trump Reaches Deal To Keep Name On Taj Mahal

4 Mar

Donald Trump Reaches Deal To Keep Name On Taj Mahal

Donald <span id="more-9508"></span>Trump Reaches Deal To Keep Name On Taj Mahal

The Trump Taj Mahal will continue to bear that name, as Donald Trump came to an agreement with Carl Icahn over keeping his family name on the resort.

The Trump Taj Mahal will still be understood by that name for the foreseeable future, ending an endeavor by Donald Trump to just take their name from the beleaguered resort.

Trump and investor Carl Icahn reached an understanding that will see the Trump name stay on the casino, despite previous indications from the Trump household which they wanted nothing in connection with the resort or Atlantic City.

‘I am thrilled to have reached a cope with Carl, somebody who i’ve great respect for both personally and professionally,’ Trump said in a statement. ‘The Trump Taj Mahal, under the right leadership and with the proposed significant reinvestment into the property, can be, once again, a wonderful destination for travel and entertainment.’

Trump Fought to Have Name Removed

The agreement comes after an ongoing battle that is legal if the Trump family could sue to own their name removed from the resort. Last month, a federal judge consented that they could go forward making use of their lawsuit; final week, the casino filed a selling point of that decision. Trump, together with his daughter Ivanka, had been successful in removing his name from the previous Trump Plaza, which can be now closed.

Trump Entertainment Resorts, which runs the casino, argued in a court filing that the Trump name was too ‘iconic’ to reduce, calling the name ‘an priceless asset.’ Donald Trump no longer runs Trump Entertainment Resorts, though he does hold a 10 % stake within the company.

Since their removal from the procedure associated with the company, Trump has regularly caused it to be clear he does not wish to be associated with Atlantic City that he is not associated with the casinos, and.

The Trumps had argued that Trump Entertainment had allowed the two casinos which used the Trump name to fall into disrepair in recent years. This, they stated, damaged their personal brand, leading to their need to separate the household title from the casinos.

Like so many other facets of the ongoing saga at the Trump Taj Mahal, the deal will need to be approved by a federal bankruptcy court judge. The Trump Taj Mahal can also be embroiled in a dispute with union workers, which are now headed to an appeals court. That legal battle hinges in the Trump Taj Mahal’s choice to break agreements with the United Here Local 54 union, which a bankruptcy court authorized. The union says that the bankruptcy court lacked the jurisdiction to make that choice.

Trump Taj Mahal fined $10 Million for Violating Bank Secrecy Act

The agreement comes just times after the Trump Taj Mahal was fined $10 million by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for repeated violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). FinCEN had purchased the casino to make regular external audits to make certain its conformity with cash laundering statutes, and the casino admitted to violating many of the requirements regarding the BSA.

‘Trump Taj Mahal received warnings that are many its inadequacies,’ FinCEN Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery said. ‘Like all gambling enterprises in this country, Trump Taj Mahal has a duty to help protect our financial system from being exploited by criminals, terrorists, and other bad actors. Far from meeting these expectations, poor compliance practices, over a long time, left the casino and our financial system unacceptably exposed.’

Foxwoods Makes Bid For Final Massachusetts Casino License

Foxwoods is hoping to snag the Massachusetts that is final casino by partnering with KG Urban Enterprises. (Image:

Foxwoods has a lot to worry about when it comes to the Massachusetts gambling enterprises which can be being constructed within the next few years.

After all, a lot of business for the Connecticut resort comes from Massachusetts, plus it’s likely that a lot of visitors will stay at house once MGM and Wynn develop their complexes that are own Springfield and Everett, correspondingly.

And with not a way to stop those Massachusetts casinos from being built, Foxwoods is attempting one time that is last grab a bit of that pie for by themselves.

Foxwoods Partners with KG Urban

Foxwoods, owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Indian tribe, has officially entered into an agreement to work with KG Urban Enterprises on a proposition for the Massachusetts casino that is final license. The operator signed a letter of intent to work with KG Urban on a casino in New Bedford. Previously, Foxwoods had shown an interest that is potential building a casino in Fall River, another location within the southeastern Massachusetts region, usually the one part of the suggest that has yet to possess its license granted.

‘We couldn’t have found a much better option for an operator,’ KG Urban Managing Director Andrew M. Stern said in a declaration. ‘No one knows the Massachusetts and New England market that is regional than the Mashantucket.’

This is not the first time Foxwoods has shown a pastime in building in the state, however. Foxwoods was one of many contenders that are early the Boston area casino permit as well, proposing a casino in Milford which was ultimately defeated by the town’s voters before it may also be looked at by state regulators.

Interestingly, the final casino battle in Massachusetts will pit Foxwoods against one of its previous allies. When wanting to build in Milford, Foxwoods partnered with Crossroads Massachusetts. That developer is currently element of team attempting to propose a casino in Somerset. There is additionally a 3rd bid that is strong the Brockton Fairgrounds, where owner George Carney is working with Rush Street Gaming so that you can bring a casino compared to that city.

Mayor’s Help for Casino Questioned

Foxwoods and KG Urban may face other hurdles as well. It appears that brand New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell is not happy with the proposal, requiring concessions through the developers and asking for a redesign associated with the proposed casino.

‘ At this point, we are not yes we may come to agreement with this mayor,’ said Andrew Paven, a spokesperson for KG Urban.

However, Mayor Mitchell’s own words sounded a tad bit more welcoming towards the casino, if not overly enthusiastic.

‘We have been in talks with the developer about whether a casino is reasonable at the proposed web site,’ Mitchell said in a statement. ‘The town would be prepared to support a casino proposal provided that, on balance, it advances the city’s long-term economic interests.’

So far, Massachusetts regulators have actually approved three gambling venues in the state. In Western Massachusetts, MGM won the right to build in Springfield with no significant opposition in the later phases of the procedure. Conversely, the Greater Boston license featured a tough battle between Wynn Resorts, which wished to build in Everett, and Mohegan Sun, which partnered with Suffolk Downs in an effort to place a resort in Revere. Regulators ultimately picked the Everett project despite objections from the city of Boston. The state has also approved a slot parlor which is put in Plainville and operated by Penn National Gaming.

Connecticut Tribes Band Together In New Push For Expanded Gambling

Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are teaming up in order to persuade Connecticut allowing for expanded gambling. (Image:

Expanded gambling in Connecticut was expected to be dead an ago month. But the proposal seems more alive than in the past, as both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods have been lobbying hard to get the state legislature to at the very least think about the measure in order to combat the new casinos that are being built in neighboring Massachusetts.

It’s unclear what the Mohegans and Mashantucket Pequots, the two tribes that operate the Native United states gambling enterprises in Connecticut, would ask for or find a way to get from state lawmakers.

It could be something as extensive being a brand new casino in northern area of the suggest that would attempt to convince state residents perhaps not traveling to Massachusetts once gambling enterprises are built there, or maybe it’s a far more modest proposal to add slot machines to off-track betting locations.

Officials, Lawmakers Talk Vaguely of Gambling Expansion

‘We’re dealing with ways to preserve jobs,’ said Mashantucket Pequot chairman Rodney Butler, he play titanic slot machine online free or the tribe were planning though he did not specify exactly what. Butler and Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority chairman Kevin Brown traveled together last Wednesday to fulfill with Democratic leaders in Connecticut’s Senate.

‘I see them as a significant employer within our state,’ said Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk), who a month ago declared their efforts dead but admitted to meeting with the tribal leaders week that is last. Like others, Duff provided details that are few what anyone was proposing.

Despite the lack of tangible proposals being floated publically, there are signs that at least some officials plan to simply help the tribes battle against increasing competition in the area.

‘The gaming industry never goes away,’ stated State Representative Stephen Dargan (D-West Haven), who states the Public Safety and Security Committee that he chairs is prone to approve some sort of gambling expansion bill by a March 19 deadline. ‘It’s always an interesting topic.’

The sudden escalation in chatter round the casino industry employs final Wednesday’s launch associated with the Northeastern Casino Gaming Research Project’s update that is latest. In line with the group’s most report that is recent Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun has seen both their revenues and their employment rolls shrink by more than 35 percent since 2006, whenever gambling enterprises were at their peaks. The combined revenue for the two casinos was just $1.9 billion year that is last down from $3.2 billion in 2006.

Governor Acknowledges Problem, It Isn’t Taking Sides

Even Governor Dannel Malloy was ready to talk about the possibility of expanded gambling in his state, though he was careful not to take a position on the issue.

‘This is not my proposal,’ Malloy said to reporters while at the Mohegan Sun casino. ‘Other people are making it. I’m maybe not saying no, I’m perhaps not saying yet.’

Malloy additionally acknowledged that the tribes will probably should do one thing once the MGM Springfield casino opens, which will be likely to happen in 2017.

‘Whether it’s nuclear or not, clearly gaming is becoming ubiquitous,’ Malloy said. ‘And so when you yourself have a state on your own northern border that is going to have at least six establishments, that is an issue. When Rhode Island improves their facilities, that’s a problem. I believe the tribal nations have stated, ‘Hey, we think this will be a method to handle that.”

No Comments

Post a Comment