Mohegan Sun CEO Mitchell Etess fired straight back at competitor Steve Wynn regarding a Massachusetts casino license (Image: wgbhnews.org file photo)
Don’t you simply love a squabble that is good? The rivalry between the two casino groups vying for the license that is coveted build a resort in Massachusetts took for a new measurement recently, as the Mohegan Sun offered razor- sharp criticism of its competitor, Wynn Resorts.
Etess Takes on Wynn
Mitchell Etess, chief executive of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, which seeks to develop a casino on 42 acres of land at the Suffolk Downs racetrack in Revere, told media sources that billionaire casino mogul Steve Wynn had petitioned state offices for numerous dispensations concerning taxes and environmental regulations for their own casino project. The Mohegan Sun proposal, Etess noted, would thus be realized more quickly and stay compliant with current state regulations. Should Wynn not receive his allowances, warned Etess, Wynn Resorts could possibly be forced to abandon the project totally.
‘Unlike Wynn, our commitment is not contingent on anything,’ the Mohegan Sun CEO said. ‘We’re ready. We don’t need alterations in the law.’
It looks like Mohegan Sun’s choice to step up the war of terms is really a reaction to Wynn’s scathing target to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission last month. While Etess used that platform to concentrate solely in the strengths of their proposal that is own, looking relaxed and talking with out a script, openly mocked the Mohegan Sun bid, stating that the $1.2 billion four-star Wynn resort would dwarf its ‘three-star’ competitor.
Wynn’s hotel rooms would be double how big Mohegan Sun’s, and much more luxurious, the iconic casino magnate said. Maybe more controversially, Wynn also claimed that the Mohegan Sun had a tax incentive to away drive customers from Massachusetts to its flagship casino in Connecticut.
‘ We’re their worst nightmare,’ he said. ‘They do not want us paying 25 percent of tax on table winnings when they pay absolutely nothing in Connecticut … If Wynn Resorts is selected, we’ve only one interest this casino in Massachusetts. We don’t give a damn about Connecticut.’
It’s really a declare that Etess strongly refutes, stating that Mohegan Sun has a duty that is legal its economic partner Brigade Capital Management never to favor one casino over the other. Etess also laid into Wynn for wanting to create on a chemical that is former, at Everett on the borders of Boston, which must be decontaminated first, a fact which will further delay the procedure.
Tax Rate Debates
He had been additionally critical of Wynn’s recommendations previously presented to your Gambling Commission in which he recommended that the long-standing state law that customers must pay tax on winnings over $600 a threshold Wynn claims is too low should be changed, and that commercial casinos should pay state tax equal to that of tribal casinos.
‘Because we participated in the gaming act’s creation and noted the careful deliberation with which the Legislature used to craft it, [Mohegan Sun] doesn’t think that the gaming act needs any major legislative changes to reach your goals,’ stated Etess.
The descent into tit-for-tat recriminations is the latest twist in a long-running saga which has already seen one bidder Caesars pull out of the process following a $100 million campaign, and subsequently file a lawsuit against the Gambling Commission. But despite voter rejection and a mounting campaign to repeal the 2011 law to legalize gambling in Massachusetts, securing a license to run here remains a hugely lucrative prospect. And with just one license up for grabs, neither party is likely to back down anytime soon.
Poll Claims Americans Want States, Not Feds, to Handle Online Gambling
A poll that is recent the majority of Americans support states’ rights to determine their online gambling fate, whether those polled perform on their own or otherwise not (Image: cardplayer.com)
In the online gambling debate, just about every faction says they know what Americans want, not to mention what’s best for them. But what happens if the people that are american really asked in regards to the subject by themselves? According to a survey that is new U.S. citizens think that a federal online gambling ban would be a bad move, and that having the states handle the regulation of online betting is just fine by them.
States’ Rights to Decide on Internet Gambling
The survey was released by the Coalition for Consumer and on line Protection (C4COP), an online gambling group who has been working to promote regulation regarding the industry in the usa.
‘ The American public doesn’t wish Congress to pass a sweeping ban of most online gaming,’ C4COP spokesperson Alison Harden Siciliano said in a statement. ‘a ban that is nationwide put more Americans at risk online, and permit the present overseas, black market gambling operations to flourish.’
The study carried out by North Star advice ended up being based on 1,000 interviews with voters across the United States. It found that voters opposed A congressional ban on online gaming by a 57 to 37 percent margin. a third that is full of ‘strongly opposed’ such a ban, while 22 percent would ‘strongly support’ one.
The study also found that 74 percent of voters think that ‘each state should decide for itself whether to permit on line gaming, and decide how to regulate gaming that is online their state.’ That statement was popular across all political groups, with 70 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of Republicans and 79 per players paradise slots facebook cent of Independents agreeing with that message.
Voters showed that same across-the-board support when asked if Americans will be able to play safe, fair online gambling games. Survey participants overwhelmingly agreed with the statement: ‘we may not personally participate in online video gaming, but I support the rights of other Us americans to do so as long as the games are fair, give regulations to protect young ones, and raise tax revenues for state and local projects.’ That declaration saw opinion by 77 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of Republicans, 69 percent of Independents.
That sort of broad support was vital that you C4COP. While North Star Opinion is a GOP polling firm, C4COP pointed out that Americans are largely united when it comes down to at minimum enabling people to play gambling that is online.
‘Voters acknowledge that they may not actually engage in online gaming, but help the rights of other Americans to take action,’ C4COP stated in a statement.
Americans have also shown that they’re ready to regulated sites when they become available as an alternative to offshore and unregulated on line gambling web sites. a poll that is recent Commercial Intelligence in brand New Jersey unearthed that 35 per cent of present Internet gamblers into the state just started playing on line after online gambling ended up being made fully appropriate here. Also more significantly, of the other two-thirds whom already had experience playing at online gambling sites, about 35 % of them had now switched up to the sites operated by Atlantic City casinos.
‘This amount of take-up, coupled aided by the movement to approved sites, represents a compelling fiscal instance study for states wanting to cut their budget deficits,’ stated Geoffrey Dixon, head of research at Commercial Intelligence.
New Mexico Approves New Navajo Nation Gambling Compact
New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez has renegotiated a gambling lightweight with the Navajo country which should give them expanded casino options (Image: (Jeffrey MacMillan/The Washington Post)
The Navajo Nation had been already in the gambling game, but now they’re set to turn into a powerhouse. The newest Mexico House of Representatives has approved a compact between your Navajos as well as the state, placing the tribe one step nearer to significantly expanding their casino presence in the Land of Enchantment.
To begin Three Hurdles
The home authorized the proposed agreement by way of a 36-30 vote this week, clearing certainly one of three hurdles that would lead to the compact being ratified. It must additionally be authorized by the brand new Mexico Senate, as well as by the U.S. Interior Department before normally it takes effect.
Obtaining the Senate approval can be the trickiest part. Lawmakers are adjourning the current session that is legislative this week, leaving little time for the Senate to debate and approve the compact.
However the Navajos had been pleased using the development, and said that they think last approval would be a positive thing for their state of the latest Mexico, aswell as for their tribe.
‘It’s a good thing for the people,’ stated Navajo President Ben Shelly.
The agreement negotiated between the tribe and Governor Susana Martinez would extend a compact that was set to expire in 2015 out through to 2037. Currently, the Navajos operate two major gambling enterprises in Gallup and Farmington, and a smaller gambling venue near Shiprock that only offers gambling that is low-stakes.
Under the new compact, the Navajos would be allowed to construct three more casinos over the next 15 years. Nonetheless, the tribe says that their first order of business is to upgrade their current facilities; only after those projects are completed would they think about expanding to virtually any new locations.
‘we foresee another casino being built to be a long, long means off,’ Shelly said.
Economic Booster for Tribe
The compact is seen as a way to promote the continued economic development on Navajo lands for proponents of the casino.
‘It will help the Navajo people, who are my people, with the keeping of their jobs,’ stated Representative Sandra Jeff. ‘If they open another facility it will be more jobs for the Navajo people.’
But, many other tribes in the state are involved that adding more Navajo casinos will influence their facilities specially the Acoma and Laguna pueblos, which say that if the Navajos open a new casino near Albuquerque, it could hurt their very own nearby casinos. Opponents explain that you will find already over 20 gambling enterprises within the state being operated by 14 tribes that are different along side several casinos at New Mexico racetracks.
‘I’m just afraid there’s maybe not industry for more facilities,’ stated Representative Georgene Louis. ‘I am worried because i’ve constituents…that work and help their families by jobs at facilities that are very close to Albuquerque.’
The Navajos, nevertheless, have remarked that they have beenn’t also certain they’ll expand at all. There is the compact that is current no limitation on the quantity of casinos they could operate.
The compact that is new be profitable for the state. The agreement would increase the rates of the re payments created by the Navajos in the future into line utilizing the rates other tribes within the state are paying. Re Payments are derived from the profits tribes receive from slot machines at their casinos.